Digital Music Can’t Be Marketed - The Rewrite
Bruce Warila |
Tue, July 8, 2008 |
End of Paid Downloads,
Music Industry Commentary,
Planning & Strategy,
The Free Music Option This is a quick rewrite derived from my post on Music Think Tank last week. If you read my comments on Music Think Tank, you will see that I combined all my thoughts into this new post.
Not long ago, record labels raked in profits by being experts at packaging and marketing music. Real and imagined benefits were shrink-wrapped into jewel cases, slick marketing coupled to payola pushed the product onto consumers by the billions, and lack of quality was a promotion problem solved by the marketing department. Digital music is changing all this. Everyone’s ability to promote and market music is eroding rapidly.
Music is now the most naked product on earth, and this nakedness is driving down overall music sales. Music sits upon the shelf unwrapped, raw and void of packaging. Consumers can fully try it before they buy it, they can take it home, and they can pay for it randomly, or not at all. I can’t think of another product that is so fully exposed and vulnerable to quick and precise, pre-purchase decision-making as music. You click. You listen. You buy. It doesn’t get any quicker or more precise than that.
Yes, exposure leads to sales, but exposure costs money, and some reasonable rate of return is expected on every dollar spent on exposure. Because music is so exposed, raw and naked, the return on investment (ROI) on every marketing dollar spent, generates the worst marketing ROI of any product I have ever marketed.
How many dollars do you have to spend on promotion, to generate a single dollar of music revenue?
Marketing and promotion is really just a form of navigation now, it can help people LOCATE a great song, but it can't budge rubbish beyond a core fan group or the teen demographic. If marketing still worked, every single record label would not be cutting back on staff and expenses.
The truth is, the only promotion that works now is…the play button.
In the naked digital music world, the solution for record labels is to increase marketing ROI through perfect targeting. The problem: extremely low margins force your targeting to be dead correct. You have to be picking the exact songs to promote to the exact audience, and without a high rate of failure. (Record labels have to become information driven businesses.) Or, if cutting down on the failure rate is not an option, you have to have a workable per-unit cost basis (thus the cutbacks), plus enough volume/velocity to make it all work (obvious right?).
Fortunately for artists that make great songs, the same naked qualities that make music impossible to market, also make music the easiest product in the world to recommend. Once again, I can’t think of another product that has the viral qualities that are inherent in music. It’s the only product where the entire product (the MP3) can be easily attached to the recommendation. Try doing that with chicken nuggets.
I fully believe, of the five billion tracks sold on iTunes to date, a billion (20% or FAR more) have been sold to consumers that have NEVER seen the artist, have NEVER visited the artist’s website or MySpace page, and have NEVER had any interaction with the artist…other than exposure to a thirty second clip. A billion(s) of iTunes purchase decisions have been driven off simple recommendation algorithms (those that liked X, also liked Y). For those that doubt this estimate, look at how much real estate the recommendation space occupies on iTunes; including the front of iTunes. If it didn’t work, it wouldn’t be there.
My advice to artists is as follows: it's far better to focus your time and money on song quality and on making lots of songs, than it is to focus on any type of typical promotion (other than putting your songs everywhere and anywhere). Time spent in the studio, or money spent on a quality producer, will yield more return than the same investment spent on marketing tricks or promotion "experts". Anyone that tells you otherwise, doesn’t realize how much music information retrieval will change the marketplace over the next five years.
If abstaining from aggressive promotion seems odd to you, the best thing you can do, is to form a consortium, or a brand of artists that brand together to promote an umbrella brand. This is a form of recommendation, and it will stretch your marketing further by having thirty or forty artists all promoting one destination; which I would argue, should be a blogsite which features artists that have sonic synergy. This strategy will improve your targeting, decrease your per-unit marketing costs, and it will drive up the sales volume of everything the brand sells.


Reader Comments (4)
Great post - passionate and authoritative. I would love to know more about what you meant by your comment about 'music retrieval'. I checked out the link but it still went over my head.
Try this paper for a primer and tutorial on Music Information Retrieval..
http://www.nowpublishers.com/product.aspx?product=INR&doi=1500000002
Hope this helps..
-Bruce
So your implication is that an artist should just throw the songs out there and hope the world catches them? With so many songs out there, that's a recipe for poverty. No, marketing in the traditional sense won't work anymore. But I can narrow down my songs to particular niches and find people in those niches who will like them. SOMETHING has to start the word of mouth and recommendation system. It's doesn't happen magically and it doesn't happen organically. And it has to be constantly tended like a garden. Even with my best fans, I can't just say, "here's a new song" and expect that they'll send it to everyone they know.
Trust me, every songwriter would like to just hole up in their studio and improve and create. But that's not reality. There's still marketing work to be done. It's just a different kind of marketing based on relationships, permission, engagement, and targeting.
And the "quality" of a song is too subjective a thing to even consider in a marketing discussion. If I go listen to the daily batch of tunes on Hype Machine, I dislike most of them. I don't think they're quality songs at all. But others seem to like them. So quality becomes a moot point.
In another realm of entertainment, many of the hottest comedians happening right now are supported by one particular website that promotes comedians. It's expensive, and from what I've been told by those comics, absolutely worth it. It's not marketing that's out, just traditional marketing. No product, including art forms, will be successful without letting people know it's there.
Phil,
I think you are underestimating the pending ability of not only music industry professionals that control all sorts of mass-market exposure opportunities, but consumers also - both will be able to filter undiscovered music by all sorts of parameters going forward. So yeah, I do think artists that just want to create, will be able to do just that.
One of the points I am making in this post is that there is minimal to no return on investment when you market digital singles. What does an hour of your time cost? How many tracks do you have to sell on iTunes to recover a $20,000 marketing spend. Almost ALL marketers fail to generate an adequate return on investment when attempting to market music.
Finally, when you get right down to it, the only thing that matters when it comes to marketing and promoting music is what happens after consumers push the play button. People can do all the promoting they want, but 1) most will never recover their investment (time and money), 2) music is just going to get easier to find going forward, and 3) what comes out of the speakers is the only thing that really (ever?) matters.
Cheers,
Bruce